MentorMe

Model guide · shipped 24 July 2026 · claude-opus-5

The dial is the model.

Opus 5 is the first Claude where the main thing you tune isn't the wording of your prompt — it's how hard you tell it to work. Frontier-grade output at $5/$25 per million tokens, half of Fable 5.

Here's what actually changed, what to delete from your old prompts, and the nine prompt blocks worth keeping.

Compiled from Anthropic's Opus 5 docs and launch-day reporting · Prompting principles, not vibes.

01 — the numbers

What you're buying.

Same price as Opus 4.8. Roughly double its score on Anthropic's hardest agentic benchmark.

Input
$5 / M tokens
Output
$25 / M tokens
Context
1M default & max
Max output
128k tokens
Thinking
On by default
Fast mode
2.5× at $10/$50
BenchmarkResultReads as
Frontier-Bench v0.143.3% vs 18.7% (Opus 4.8)More than double, at lower cost per task
CursorBench 3.2Within 0.5% of Fable 5Half the price for near-parity coding
ARC-AGI 33× the next-best modelNovel-reasoning gap, not a rounding error
OSWorld 2.0 (computer use)Beats Fable 5's bestAt about one-third the cost
Zapier AutomationBench~1.5× next-best; 100% on churn tasksReal business automation, not toy tasks
Organic chemistry (internal)+10.2 pts over 4.8Best generally available Claude for science
Legal first-turn redlines~2× Opus 4.8Professional first drafts, not outlines
The number that matters most in production

Harvey reported Opus 5 matching Opus 4.8-at-maximum-reasoning output quality while cutting average token usage 26%. The saving isn't the sticker price — it's that lower effort now clears the bar the old model needed max effort to clear.

02 — the effort ladder

Pick a rung, then stop fiddling.

Effort governs every token in the response — thinking, tool calls, and arguments — not just reasoning. Lower effort means fewer tool calls, less preamble, terser confirmations.

LevelUse it forVerdict on Opus 5
lowClassification, lookups, subagents, high-volume chatuse freely — materially stronger than earlier Opus lows
mediumRoutine agentic work, balanced cost and speeduse freely — your primary cost lever
high (default)Complex reasoning, most knowledge worksafe default — identical to omitting the parameter
xhighCoding, agentic runs over 30 minutes, deep searchstart here for code — Anthropic's own recommendation
maxGenuinely frontier problems onlymeasure first — big cost, small delta on most work

In Claude Code and claude.ai

Type /effort xhigh for a real coding session or agent run; leave it at high for quick edits and questions. Drop to mediumwhen you're doing something repetitive and want speed. ultracode in the Claude Code menu is not a sixth API level — it's xhigh plus standing permission to launch multi-agent workflows.

In the API

0 · output_config.effort

{
  "model": "claude-opus-5",
  "max_tokens": 64000,
  "stream": true,
  "output_config": { "effort": "xhigh" },
  "messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "..." }]
}

At xhigh or max, set max_tokens high — 64k is a sane starting point — because it caps thinking plus response text together. And stream: 64k of output can run past the non-streaming time limit.

Three traps

1. Effort controls thinking volume, not visible response length. Lowering it will not shorten the answer — you have to ask for brevity in words. 2. Changing effort mid-conversation invalidates your prompt cache, because effort shapes the rendered prompt. Pick one level per session. 3. thinking: {"type":"disabled"}at xhigh or max returns a 400. That's the breaking change from 4.8.

03 — migration

The instructions to delete.

The single highest-leverage thing you can do with an old Opus 4.8 prompt is take things out of it. Opus 5 already does several of the behaviors your prompt was compensating for, and telling it twice makes it do them twice.

If your prompt says…Do thisBecause
"Include a final verification step" / "use a subagent to verify"deleteIt self-verifies. The instruction causes over-verification and burns tokens for no quality gain.
"Double-check your answer before responding"deleteSame compounding problem — it already catches and fixes its own mistakes.
"Only report high-severity issues" (code review)deleteIt follows this literally and under-reports. Ask for everything, filter in a second pass.
"Do not think" / "do not reason"deleteIncreases the odds of internal XML tags leaking into visible output.
Vision workarounds tuned for older modelsre-testChart, diagram and UI-replication accuracy jumped; the crutch may now hurt.
Effort defaults inherited from 4.8 / 4.7re-sweepLow and medium clear bars they used not to. Re-run the sweep on your own evals.
thinking: {"type":"adaptive"}keepStill valid, now equivalent to the default. But revisit max_tokens: thinking now counts against it.

What to add instead

Opus 5's rough edges are all the same shape — it does more. Longer answers, longer documents, more narration, more delegation, wider scope. Every prompt below trims one of those.

04 — the prompt library

Nine blocks worth keeping.

Paste into a system prompt, a CLAUDE.md, or the top of a long chat. Each one is aimed at a specific measured behavior, not vibes.

1 · Conciseness — user-facing products

Keep responses focused, brief, and concise. Keep disclaimers and caveats short, and spend most of the response on the main answer. When asked to explain something, give a high-level summary unless an in-depth explanation is specifically requested.

Opus 5's default answers run longer than 4.8's. This is the fix — effort is not.

2 · The end-of-prompt reminder

<tone_preference>
Keep outputs reasonably concise.
</tone_preference>

In a long system prompt, pair the full instruction near the top with this short reminder near the end.

3 · Narration cadence during agent runs

Before your first tool call, say in one sentence what you're about to do. While working, give a brief update only when you find something important or change direction. When you finish, lead with the outcome: your first sentence should answer "what happened" or "what did you find," with supporting detail after it for readers who want it.

Opus 5 announces what it's about to do, often at length. Describe the cadence you want; positive examples beat prohibitions.

4 · Written deliverable length

Match the length of written documents to what the task needs: cover the substance, but do not pad with filler sections, redundant summaries, or boilerplate.

Files written to disk — reports, Markdown, summaries — bloat independently of conversational verbosity. This is a separate lever.

5 · Scope control

Deliver what was asked, at the scope intended. Make routine judgment calls yourself, and check in only when different readings of the request would lead to materially different work. If the request seems mistaken or a better approach exists, say so in a sentence and continue with the task as asked rather than quietly narrowing, widening, or transforming it. Finish the whole task, and stop short of actions that are clearly beyond what was asked.

The best all-purpose block on this page. Opus 5 will apply its own judgment about what the task "should" be unless you draw the line.

6 · Cap subagent spawning

Delegate to a subagent only for large tasks that are genuinely independent and parallelizable, such as a wide multi-file investigation. Do not delegate work you can finish yourself in a handful of tool calls, and do not use subagents to verify or double-check your own work. If one subagent can complete the task, use one rather than several, and keep spawn counts low.

Delegation multiplies cost and wall-clock on small tasks. Opus 5 reaches for it more readily than 4.8 did.

7 · Stop narrating corrections

Only correct an earlier statement when the error would change the user's code, conclusions, or decisions. State corrections plainly and briefly, then continue the task. For slips that change nothing for the user, make the fix and move on without noting it.

Self-correction is a feature; narrating every self-correction to a customer is not.

8 · Code review that finds everything

Review this change and report every issue you find, including low-severity ones and anything you are only moderately confident about. Do not filter for severity — I will triage in a separate pass. For each finding give the file and line, a one-sentence statement of the defect, and a concrete failure scenario with inputs and the wrong result.

Precision and recall are both high on Opus 5, and accuracy holds at lower effort — so run a fast medium pass at review time and a thorough xhigh pass later.

9 · If you must disable thinking

You may say a brief sentence before using a tool.
Do not include internal or system XML tags in your response.

With thinking off, Opus 5 occasionally writes a tool call as plain text (it never runs, and it poisons later turns) or leaks tags. These two lines mitigate both. Better: keep thinking on and drop effort instead.

Nine prompts is a start, not a system

Prompting is not a strategy. Wanting a 90-day plan that runs your whole business on AI is.

Build my 90-day AI roadmap →

05 — routing

What to point it at.

Where the model earns its price, and where a cheaper one would do.

Give it the whole spec, then leave

Opus 5 is strongest on multi-file features, large refactors and end-to-end work, and it finishes rather than leaving stubs and TODOs. Front-load the complete specification instead of drip-feeding steps.

Two-speed code review

Real bugs at a high rate per pass, with extra findings that are mostly real. Accuracy holds low, so run cheap at commit time and deep before release.

Vision with tools, not just thinking

Charts, dense documents, diagrams, and UI replication. Give it bash and crop tools so it can inspect and visually verify — that beats spending the budget on thinking alone.

The full million tokens

1M context is both default and maximum, and instruction following, tool calls and reasoning stay consistent across the window. Whole-repo and whole-deal-room work is on the table.

Spreadsheets and decks

Multi-sheet workbooks with non-trivial formulas, and well-structured slides. It will follow a house template — but only if you hand it one.

Orchestration

Writer-verifier subagent teams hold together, with few agents clobbering each other's work. Cap the spawn count for cost, not for correctness.

06 — quietly useful

Four changes nobody put in the headline.

Prompt cache minimum dropped to 512 tokens (from 1,024). Short system prompts that could never cache on 4.8 now can, with no code change.

Mid-conversation tool changes (beta). Add or remove tools between turns without invalidating the cache — header mid-conversation-tool-changes-2026-07-01.

Default fallbacks mode (beta). fallbacks: "default" routes refusals by category to Anthropic's recommended alternates instead of a list you maintain — header server-side-fallback-2026-07-01.

Fast mode. 2.5× throughput at double the rate ($10/$50), Claude API only — not on Bedrock, Google Cloud or Microsoft Foundry yet.

Founder —

Now you know how to run Opus 5: the effort dial, what to strip from your prompts, the nine blocks that hold up under real deadlines.

Prompting is the easy 20%. The other 80% is deciding what to point it at first, in what order, inside a business that still has to make payroll. That's the part we build with you — a 90-day roadmap, not another prompt pack.

— Italo

Tools change. Prompting principles don't.

— why this guide won't be outdated next month

Straight answers · no spin

07 — straight answers

The questions everyone is asking.

Not quite, and that's the point. Opus 5 lands within 0.5% of Fable 5 on CursorBench 3.2 and beats it on OSWorld computer use, at half to a third of the cost. Fable 5 stays ahead on the hardest long-horizon, multi-day, ambiguous work. If a task takes a person hours or days and nobody has solved it yet, that's Fable. Everything else is Opus 5.

Still have questions about running your business on this

Skip the trial and error. Get the 90-day plan that turns these answers into revenue.

Get my free roadmap →

The adventure is the climb

Know the model. Now build the business.

Build my 90-day roadmap →
Free roadmap · 4 minutes · no cardBuilt around your business — not a template